<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Assistenzärztin wird Millionärin</title>
	<atom:link href="http://aquacool.subzeroblue.com/2004/03/30/assistenzarztin-wird-millionarin/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://aquacool.subzeroblue.com/2004/03/30/assistenzarztin-wird-millionarin/</link>
	<description>Drops of dew to tickle your senses.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 04 Dec 2011 12:44:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hartmut Schlagbauer</title>
		<link>http://aquacool.subzeroblue.com/2004/03/30/assistenzarztin-wird-millionarin/#comment-514</link>
		<dc:creator>Hartmut Schlagbauer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Apr 2006 08:20:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-514</guid>
		<description>On 24 April 2006 in Wer wird Millionär Mr 

Jauch claimed that an &quot;infinite decimal&quot; is a rational number. Example was Pi. This is wrong. If a group of figures is repeated infinitely often (&quot;repeating decimal&quot; like 

6,7834343434343...) the number is rational, if this is not the case it is irrational. Pi is irrational, proof not trivial, given in a paper around 1905. 0,09 is a rational number, i.e. 

a fraction of the form m/n with m and n integer, m=9, n=100.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 24 April 2006 in Wer wird Millionär Mr </p>
<p>Jauch claimed that an &#8220;infinite decimal&#8221; is a rational number. Example was Pi. This is wrong. If a group of figures is repeated infinitely often (&#8220;repeating decimal&#8221; like </p>
<p>6,7834343434343&#8230;) the number is rational, if this is not the case it is irrational. Pi is irrational, proof not trivial, given in a paper around 1905. 0,09 is a rational number, i.e. </p>
<p>a fraction of the form m/n with m and n integer, m=9, n=100.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

